The Supreme Court of Facebook

Bu bölüm hakkında

<p><span>Facebook is at the center of the hottest controversies over freedom of speech, and its opaque, unaccountable decisions have angered people across the political spectrum. Mark Zuckerberg’s answer to this mess is to outsource: Facebook recently created and endowed a permanent body it calls the Oversight Board—like a Supreme Court whose decisions will be binding for the company. And Facebook immediately referred to the board a crucial question: whether to reinstate Donald Trump on the platform, after he was banned for inciting the January 6th riot at the Capitol. In this collaboration between the New Yorker Radio Hour and </span><a href="https://www.wnycstudios.org/podcasts/radiolab"><span>Radiolab</span></a><span>, the producer Simon Adler explores the creation of the Oversight Board with Kate Klonick, whose </span><a href="https://www.newyorker.com/tech/annals-of-technology/inside-the-making-of-facebooks-supreme-court"><span>reporting</span></a><span> appears in </span><i><span>The New Yorker</span></i><span>. What they learn calls into question whether Zuckerberg’s fundamentally American-style view of free speech can be exported around the world without resulting in sometimes dire consequences. </span></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>