The surprising ways the Supreme Court curbed Trump’s power

Su questo episodio

<p>From <a href="https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/apple-news-in-conversation/id1577591053?i=1000776173199"><em>Apple News In Conversation</em></a>: The Supreme Court just wrapped one of its most consequential terms in recent memory &mdash; issuing major rulings on presidential power, birthright citizenship, and the rights of transgender athletes. But the story playing out in most headlines, legal analyst Sarah Isgur argues, is missing the bigger picture. Isgur is the editor of <a href="https://www.scotusblog.com/" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">SCOTUSblog</a> and the author of <a href="https://books.apple.com/us/book/last-branch-standing/id6749607120" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Last Branch Standing: A Potentially Surprising, Occasionally Witty Journey Inside Today&rsquo;s Supreme Court</em></a>. She joined <em>Apple News In Conversation</em> guest host David Greene to explain why she considers this the hardest term in the Roberts Court&rsquo;s history, why Trump has lost far more cases than he&rsquo;s won, and why the political framework most people use to understand the court tells only a fraction of the story.</p>